The SEC has simply issued its second “no-action letter” towards a decentralized bodily infrastructure community (DePIN) crypto challenge in latest months, giving its native token “regulatory cowl” from enforcement.
The no-action letter was despatched to the Solana DePIN challenge Fuse, which points a community token, FUSE, as a reward to these actively sustaining the community.
Fuse initially submitted a letter to the SEC’s Division of Company Finance on Nov. 19, asking for official affirmation that it might not suggest the SEC take enforcement motion if the challenge continues to supply and promote FUSE tokens.
Fuse additionally outlined in its letter that FUSE is designed for community utility and consumptive functions, not for hypothesis. They will solely be redeemed for a mean market value through third events.
“Primarily based on the information introduced, the Division won’t suggest enforcement motion to the Fee if, in reliance in your opinion as counsel, Fuse affords and sells the Tokens within the method and beneath the circumstances described in your letter,” the Division of Company Finance’s deputy chief counsel, Jonathan Ingram, wrote on Monday.
The newest SEC no-action letter comes just some months after the SEC issued an identical “extremely coveted” letter to Double Zero, which was seen because of a brand new, extra crypto-friendly management on the SEC.
On the time, DoubleZero co-founder Austin Federa said such letters are widespread in TradFi however are “very uncommon” within the crypto house.
“It was a months lengthy course of, however we discovered the SEC to be fairly receptive, we discovered them to be fairly skilled, fairly diligent, there was no crypto animosity.”
The SEC was put beneath new management in April, after Paul Atkins was sworn in because the thirty fourth chairman, and the company has since been seen taking a extra balanced method to crypto. As a part of the management, crypto-friendly Hester Peirce additionally heads up the company’s crypto job power.
SEC no-action letters are a type of regulatory readability
Including to the discussion on X, Rebecca Rettig, a authorized consultant of Solana MEV infrastructure platform Jito Labs, stated that no-action letters are wanted by many crypto tasks.
“Why do crypto groups need them? ‘Regulatory readability.’ If you happen to’re planning to concern a token, a NAL offers cheap assurance you received’t face instant enforcement for violations of securities legal guidelines. It’s a sort of ‘regulatory cowl,’” she wrote.
SEC giving a cross to Fuse wasn’t sudden: Crypto lawyer
The no-action letter doesn’t essentially set any new precedents, nonetheless.
Commenting on the topic through X on Monday, Consensys lawyer Invoice Hughes said this was “a simple case,” given the character of Fuse’s token.
“The take away is that there’s not a lawyer in crypto that will have thought this token was a safety. And possibly not even any lawyer who’s merely aware of Howey,” Hughes stated.
Crypto founders reward SEC’s new management
After an period by which many US crypto founders, companies and tasks stated they felt hostility from the SEC beneath former chair Gary Gensler, the most recent interplay with Fuse signifies the company has dramatically shifted its approach.
Associated: SEC to hold privacy and financial surveillance roundtable in December
The identical month that Double Zero secured its no-action letter, the SEC additionally issued an identical no-action letter for crypto-custodians that don’t qualify as banks.
Whereas they nonetheless have to fulfill strict situations, the no-action letter offers clear tips for acceptable methods for these kinds of companies to function and cope with crypto, one thing which the industry has been begging for over the previous few years.
Journal: 2026 is the year of pragmatic privacy in crypto: Canton, Zcash and more
