US Court Grants Brief Stay In Coinbase Lawsuit Involving Biometric Data

An Illinois decide has granted a movement to remain proceedings in a lawsuit towards cryptocurrency change Coinbase pending a ruling within the appellate court docket.

In a Thursday submitting within the US District Court docket for the Northern District of Illinois Jap Division, Choose Sharon Johnson Coleman granted a movement filed by Coinbase to remain a lawsuit involving alleged violations of the state’s Biometric Data Privateness Act.

The movement requested ready for a ruling from the US Court docket of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which is contemplating a case involving Nuance Communications supplying voice identification know-how to Charles Schwab — a choice that would influence the Coinbase lawsuit. 

“[T]he Court docket finds that the keep would simplify the problems and streamline the trial […] scale back the burden of litigation on the Court docket and the events […] [and] wouldn’t unduly prejudice or tactically drawback Plaintiffs,” mentioned the Thursday submitting granting Coinbase’s movement.

The lawsuit, filed in Could, alleged that Coinbase’s “wholesale assortment” of faceprints for its Know Your Buyer (KYC) necessities violated the Illinois law, as customers weren’t notified. The group of Coinbase customers additionally alleged that the change shared their biometric information with out their consent to third-party verification suppliers, which was a violation of the legislation.

Associated: Coinbase CEO sees $1M Bitcoin, but let’s hit $124K first, Analyst says

Below Illinois’ Biometric Data Privateness Act, non-public entities that violate the legislation in a “reckless” or “intentional” method could also be required to pay damages as much as $5,000 for every occasion, in addition to $1,000 for every negligent violation. The plaintiffs additionally sought aid for litigation bills. 

Main Coinbase information breach

In Could, Coinbase disclosed that a group of buyer assist contractors accessed account information for customers in change for bribes. The contractors, based mostly in India, had been later fired.